Scoping that removes things
We start by identifying the single riskiest assumption and cutting everything that does not test it. Expect us to argue for a smaller build than you arrived with.
A fixed-price, fixed-timeline first version built around the one thing your product must prove. You get something real in users' hands while the question is still worth answering, and you own every line of it.

First versions fail for a predictable reason: too much. Every feature that seems essential goes in, launch slips two quarters, money runs out before anyone learns whether the core idea works. The feature that would have proved it shipped alongside forty that did not matter yet.
An MVP is not a cheap version of the real product. It is an instrument for answering one question (will people use this, and will they pay) with the smallest thing that can answer it credibly.
So the most valuable part of this engagement is usually the scoping. We are direct about what to cut, and we hold a fixed price and a fixed timeline so the budget is knowable up front. Founders do not need another open-ended engineering bill.
We start by identifying the single riskiest assumption and cutting everything that does not test it. Expect us to argue for a smaller build than you arrived with.
Both agreed before we start. You know exactly what it costs and when it lands, which is the part most agencies will not commit to.
Every week you see the product running. No surprises at the end, and space to redirect while redirecting is still cheap.
A prototype that cannot handle its first hundred users is a liability. We use the same stack as our full builds so a working MVP can be extended rather than thrown away.
Instrumented before launch so you can answer 'is this working' with data. An MVP that ships without measurement has skipped the entire point.
Repository, hosting, domains, and third-party accounts all set up under your ownership. If you never speak to us again, nothing breaks.
Listed explicitly so there is no argument later about what was in scope.
We would rather lose the enquiry than take on work we are the wrong people for.
Larger engagements vary enough that a headline number would mislead, so those are quoted after a free call. We always tell you what drives the number.
Proving one core loop, at a fixed price, with a fixed date.
Quoted
A fixed price and fixed date, both agreed before we start
6 weeks
A first version with several journeys, ready to put in front of investors or paying users.
Quoted
Priced after the scoping workshop
3-4 months
Building on what the first users actually told you.
Quoted
Monthly, priced on the share of the team you reserve
Rolling monthly
Yes, for the scope agreed in the scoping workshop. That is the trade: the scope is fixed too. If you decide mid-build to add something outside it, we quote that separately rather than absorbing it quietly and cutting corners elsewhere, which is how fixed-price projects usually go wrong.
No. We are a paid vendor and we think that is the healthier arrangement for both sides. It keeps our incentive on delivering your product well rather than on managing a position in your company. It also means you keep your cap table clean.
That is the intended outcome, and the MVP is built for it: same stack, same standards as our full builds, so it extends rather than needing a rewrite. You can continue with us on a monthly basis, hire your own team around the codebase, or bring in another agency. The documentation and handover exist to make all three real options.
That is the most valuable part of the engagement, and the scoping workshop is where it happens. We work back from the single riskiest assumption in your business and cut everything that does not test it. Founders often tell us afterwards that the cutting mattered more than the code.
Thirty minutes, no pitch. We will tell you what we would do, what it would take, and whether you need us at all.